![]() |
| Still from the Chāy-e Narges 70s Iranian ad |
Yesterday I was made aware of the 70s ad in Iran for Chāy-e Narges (here), in it, a model sporting a tank top and a mini skirt with long uncovered hair does what every model does since time immemorial. Behind her, sitting, seems what are relatives much more conservatively dressed with an elderly woman having a scarf tied on her head (not the classic "veil" but a head-cover none-the-less).
Of course, this, according to the internet is hailed as being as to how Iran was permissive, progressive, and liberal it was before the Islamic revolution. Well, of course, everything is reductive, stereotypical and generalized. Let me give another example, on January 1rst 1978 Elias Rahbani (and his orchestra) released Liza Liza - the quasi immortal disco anthem. The cover had - literally - a bare-chested woman on it. Below is a censored version to avoid offending anyone.
The point is, neither Chāy-e Narges nor the Liza Liza vinyl cover say anything about Iranian or Lebanese society at the time nor about the cultural, ethical and social norms that governed both societies then. If anything, those were the exceptions that proved the rule.
When I tell foreigners Lebanon is conservative, the immediate culprit is the Muslim part of the Lebanese population. The Marie France incident (here) is a good example how conservatism runs rampant in all factions of the population - Christians and Muslims alike. And this has nothing to do with the levels of "education" some people boast about (here). Being a "technocrat" does not divorce your from beliefs that run rampant with less-educated people.
Images of Beirut in the 70s, which, yes, also include tank tops and mini skirts are "always" indicative as to how the country got radicalized to what it is today. Yet, the country that was shown, was one in urban dwellings where morals and habits are much loser than in rural dwellings, and even by city-standards, conservatism is still there in many shapes and forms - anything from rituals (fasting, attending religious edifices) to less noted signs and signifiers - such as wearing long sleeves for women, or curfews (mostly applied to daughters rather than sons), etc...
The image below by Rudolf Dietrich, can be a very good indicator of how economic and social disparity can be a much better indicator of social norms.
To quote again, what I wrote earlier (here): Under the Al Shams building, one of the most celebrated jewels of modernist architecture (by architect Joseph Philippe Karam) and in the pathways that made way to the sea, lived people in extreme Poverty, in makeshift houses. Literally at a stone throw from one of the most luxurious buildings of Beirut at the time.
So to reiterate the point, liberal bubbles were mostly the exceptions that proved the rule, rather than anything else.
.jpg)













.jpg)
.jpeg)




